Socialization is "the lifelong process of inheriting and disseminating norms, customs and ideologies provide an individual with the skills and habits necessary for participating within his or her own society. Socialization is thus ‘the means by which social and cultural continuity are attained." The social internet socialises us, its users. It, us, teaches us new ways to be. Here is a somewhat new practice on social media, which has been written about: encouraging fellow social media users to not see something violent/violating because the act of sourcing and seeing is acknowledged as perpetuating that violence. After James Foley's and Steven Sotloff's murders, internet users were saying of the videos circulating online: 'don't see it, don't look at it'; and, there were pictures of the journalists with their families, shared, possibly, to counter these videos. Their families, understandably, wanted their loved one to be remembered in a certain way, not as a headless body or as the victim of a gruesome crime. Even as fact is being ruthlessly documented, there is a reactive counter-pressure to erase the facts. The same thing played out as personal photos of the actor Jennifer Lawrence were stolen and revealed. Social media saw some specific kinds of struggles over seeing and not seeing: "this is the internet and this is how it works, so just deal with it… and take a look at how hot she is"; "seeing those pictures is abusive so be part of the solution, not the problem"; and another version of this: "if she sent them to you, then you were meant to see those pictures, not otherwise" How does this relate to the work of images in politics? It is a little like the visual equivalent of the right to be forgotten, or the peekaboo games that delight babies: if you can't see it, the violence isn't there any more, the violations don't hurt, it has been neutralised.